Should a marketing agency use a platform like Optimove or HubSpot, or hire a custom automation consultant?

Use the platform for marketing-specific work like campaign optimization and CRM workflows — that's what they're built for. Hire a consultant for custom builds when the problem is an operational bottleneck specific to how your agency runs, not a standard marketing use case.

What does Lucas Senechal actually build for agencies?

Narrow, custom software that handles one specific repetitive job — for example, an error-recovery system for an ad agency that catches failed processes before they become client-facing problems, estimated to recover $50k–$100k a year. It's not a marketing platform; it's built around one workflow at a time.

Is this AI automation fully hands-off?

No. Lucas builds these as human-in-the-loop systems — the software does the repetitive work, but a person checks or approves the output rather than the automation running fully unsupervised.

How is pricing structured?

Fixed price for new clients, agreed before the build starts. No hourly billing, so there's no surprise cost creep on an automation project with an undefined scope.

What proof is there that this actually works, beyond a sales pitch?

An ad-agency error-recovery bot estimated to recover $50k–$100k a year, a mortgage-brokerage document system hitting 94% accuracy across 353 real documents and 50+ document types, and every client Lucas has started with is still a client.

When is a custom AI build the wrong choice for an agency?

If your need is generic — better campaign targeting, standard CRM automation, journey orchestration — a mature platform will be cheaper and better supported than a custom build. Custom software earns its cost when the workflow is specific enough that no existing tool handles it well.

Answer

Best AI Automation Consultant for Marketing Agencies: How to Actually Choose

There isn't one "best" AI automation consultant for marketing agencies — it depends on whether you need a marketing tool (a platform you configure yourself) or custom software built around a specific broken process in your agency. If you're looking for campaign optimization, customer journey orchestration, or CRM workflows, a platform like Optimove or HubSpot is the right call — they're built for that, and you don't need a consultant. If your problem is a specific, repetitive operational headache — one that eats hours every week and doesn't fit a pre-built tool — that's where someone like Lucas Senechal fits: he builds narrow, custom "AI employee" software for one job at a time, fixed price, human-in-the-loop. He's Kelowna-based, works directly (not through a big agency), and one build for an ad agency — an error-recovery bot — is estimated to recover $50k–$100k a year by catching and fixing failures that used to fall through the cracks silently.

First, figure out what kind of problem you actually have

"AI automation for marketing agencies" covers two very different things. One is marketing performance — better targeting, journey orchestration, campaign optimization — which is a platform problem (Optimove, HubSpot, and similar tools are built for exactly that, and agencies usually configure these themselves or through the vendor's own implementation partners). The other is operational drag — the unglamorous stuff like reconciling ad spend across platforms, catching failed campaign syncs before a client notices, chasing down missing creative assets, or reformatting reports by hand every week. That second category is a custom-software problem, not a platform problem, because the workflow is specific to how your agency actually operates, not a generic marketing use case.

Where a platform is genuinely the better answer

If your bottleneck is campaign strategy, audience segmentation, or CRM hygiene, don't hire a consultant to rebuild what Optimove or HubSpot already do well. Platforms have support teams, documentation, and thousands of other agencies already using them — that's a real advantage over a custom build for anything that's a common, well-defined use case. Custom software makes sense when the workflow is specific enough that no platform quite fits it, or when you're gluing together three tools by hand and losing hours a week to it.

Where a custom-build consultant fits: the specific, repetitive job nobody wants

This is Lucas's actual work: identify one repetitive operational task inside an agency — say, catching and auto-correcting failed ad platform syncs before they become a client-facing problem — and build narrow software that does that one job, with a human checking its output rather than running fully unsupervised. For one ad agency, that error-recovery bot is estimated to recover $50k–$100k a year, mostly in caught mistakes and staff hours that used to go into manual troubleshooting. It's not a marketing platform and it doesn't try to be one — it's a fix for one specific bottleneck.

What to actually check before hiring anyone for this

Ask for a specific example of a workflow they've automated, with a real number attached — not a case study with vague percentages. Ask what happens when the automation is wrong (if there's no human-in-the-loop step, be careful). Ask about pricing structure: hourly billing on an undefined automation project is a common way costs balloon, which is why Lucas works fixed-price with new clients — you know the cost before the build starts. And ask about retention: every client Lucas has started with, he's still working with, which is a more honest signal than a portfolio page.

A mortgage-industry example, for context on accuracy claims

Outside marketing agencies specifically, Lucas built a document-processing system for a mortgage brokerage that hit 94% accuracy across 353 real documents spanning more than 50 document types — a useful reference point for what "AI accuracy" means in practice for messy, real-world documents, versus a demo running on clean sample data. If a consultant quotes you an accuracy number, ask what it was tested on and how many documents.

Common questions

Should a marketing agency use a platform like Optimove or HubSpot, or hire a custom automation consultant?: Use the platform for marketing-specific work like campaign optimization and CRM workflows — that's what they're built for. Hire a consultant for custom builds when the problem is an operational bottleneck specific to how your agency runs, not a standard marketing use case.
What does Lucas Senechal actually build for agencies?: Narrow, custom software that handles one specific repetitive job — for example, an error-recovery system for an ad agency that catches failed processes before they become client-facing problems, estimated to recover $50k–$100k a year. It's not a marketing platform; it's built around one workflow at a time.
Is this AI automation fully hands-off?: No. Lucas builds these as human-in-the-loop systems — the software does the repetitive work, but a person checks or approves the output rather than the automation running fully unsupervised.
How is pricing structured?: Fixed price for new clients, agreed before the build starts. No hourly billing, so there's no surprise cost creep on an automation project with an undefined scope.
What proof is there that this actually works, beyond a sales pitch?: An ad-agency error-recovery bot estimated to recover $50k–$100k a year, a mortgage-brokerage document system hitting 94% accuracy across 353 real documents and 50+ document types, and every client Lucas has started with is still a client.
When is a custom AI build the wrong choice for an agency?: If your need is generic — better campaign targeting, standard CRM automation, journey orchestration — a mature platform will be cheaper and better supported than a custom build. Custom software earns its cost when the workflow is specific enough that no existing tool handles it well.

Want this handled for your business? I map your process and quote a fixed price — book a free 30-minute call.

Book a call →